Posted by
Miguel on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:26:35 AM
The
Mayor didn’t Raise his Hand
“Si Se
Puedes!” or Something Like That.
By Perry
Hartline
Any reporter
who claims they want only facts is a liar. Shouts, screams, shame and
disgrace;
fistfights, shootouts and knife fights; tragedy, pain and tears are news
food.
Tonight held the promise of fine dining: a racial scrap. White media
vans
circled city hall hunting it.
On city hall
plaza ten people costumed as traditional ethnic-Mexicans, campesinos, in
white
trousers, white anti-Arizona T-shirts, red bandanas and LA Gear running
shoes
gripped hand-lettered signs in Spanish chanting “Hey! Hey! Ho-Ho! Racist
laws have got to go!” and “Si se puedes!” [Yes we can!], “We’re
Here! And we’re Not Going Away!” and “What’s yours now
will be ours!” The only thing missing was sombreros.
The Arizona
boycott, open border, amnesty and reconquista organizations were out,
armed
with slogans and signs. They were attended by a menagerie of lawyers,
community
organizers; a civic leader in a suit; and potbellied central labor
council
figures wrapped in suspenders and Ben Davis work pants.
In city
hall’s polished-glass and butter-yellow marble rotunda, thirty-or-so
people milled about hoping for seats in-chamber. Four 30-ish, manicured
men in
suits who feed off local government stood chatting and laughing. Twelve
anti-boycott, pro-Arizona citizens stood silent, holding the flag of the
United
States. To their left eight practicing ethnic Mexicans surrounded a
large sign
in Spanish.
Painted faces
in high heels waving microphones towed cameramen panning for head
shots.
Newspaper reporters squeezing pens and pads prowled the thin crowd with
photographers. Telemundo, the Spanish language network, sent a shiny
brunette
and a duck-walking, bent-kneed man with a video cam stuck to his face.
The
brunette waved her mic at a stranger asking, “What brings you here
tonight, sir?” The man turned to speak. The camera pulled in tight as a
city officer stepped out of chambers and counted heads. She motioned
four
people to the security scanner, and eyed the door for anybody leaving
the
meeting. The man spun around and marched to the scanner.
The city
council chamber was stuffed, the air fuzzy and warm from bodies squeezed
belly-to-butt, and nostrils breathing down necks. The media packed the
forward
areas and blocked the aisles with cameras for close-ups of Mayor Johnson
and
the city council members, particularly Councilman Fong, who called for
the
boycott resolution. About Three-fifths of the citizens came to encourage
Fong
and demand the City of Sacramento officially boycott the state of
Arizona for
passing SB 1070, the law that adopted Federal immigration law and
applied it to
state law, only less stringent. The remaining two-fifths had come to
oppose
Sacramento telling Arizona how to govern itself.
City Attorney
Eileen Tiechert stood and read the law, SB 1070, to the citizens. She
did so
clearly and correctly. SB 1070 sounded reasonable and straightforward,
and
brief.
The Ground
Rules
Each side was
allowed an equal number of speakers, with two minutes to make remarks.
The
anti-boycott supporters would lead. Most were blue-collar workers,
tradesmen
and small business people, and included two unemployed people. They had
no
leaders, lawyers, politicians, community organizers or venerated
community
symbols to stand with them. They understand Republican Party politicians
simply
go along with the ‘progressives’ and are frightened by
“racism!” and ‘racialists.’ They accommodate the progs,
cower before ethnic groups, take what goodies they can and merely delay
the
erosion of law, and the fall of America. They’re afraid to fight.
The people who
came here to fight the boycott aren’t financed by government grants.
They
aren’t funded by Federal, state or community programs and funds. They
have themselves, a dream handed to them by dead white males 234 years
ago, and
a feeling of doom that the dream is vulnerable and being destroyed.
They’ve come to do combat the way Americans always have against wrong,
injustice, lunacy, fascism, what have you. They use individual
initiative.
Nervous, disorganized, unschooled in public speaking, inexperienced in
community organizing and public protest, they’re the ineloquent average
American standing up to say “NO!” to a threat. Some of their
remarks follow.
Geo Riley,
California Republican Veterans Association, a Native American and Jew. [Riley?!] “Considering the
city’s forty million dollars in debt why are you worried about
Arizona?!” Riley asked, “How many of you have actually read the
law, or ever had it read to you, until tonight?” Riley scanned the room.
Perhaps fourteen or fifteen hands went up. Councilman Fong didn’t raise
his hand. The Mayor didn’t raise his hand.
Carl, an African-American, “I
don’t feel sorry for people who break the law! They should not
be rewarded! Why should they be? Why should we let them in? Why do we
have a
border? So far they’re doing more harm than good. The people of Arizona
want help. The government should be working alongside them, not fighting
them!”
David, “I’m dismayed we’re
talking about this! This law mirrors Federal law! We’re a nation of
laws!
We can’t pick-and-choose which law to break and which one to enforce.
And
why does Mexico get special treatment? Why? Has anyone ever looked at
what the
Mexicans do to illegal immigrants? How the Guatemalans are beaten, raped
and
put in jail? Is that okay?”
A woman,
name unknown,
a legal
immigrant from Central America spoke passionately to those who would
boycott,
“You here!” She turned to the crowd, “Fix Mexico first!
You should not be forgiven because of sympathy! I waited in line. I’m
here legally. I attended classes for years, learned English, and studied
our
government. Take your Spanish signs and demonstrate in front of
Calderon!”
Paul
Smith,
“You’re considering boycotting Arizona. What’ll you do if
seventeen other states adopt Arizona’s law? Will you boycott them too?
And what does this tell people all over the world, in the Philippines,
Ireland,
Vietnam, who want to come here and be Americans?”
Dan Starr, “I was a marine in Iraq.”
Some in the audience clapped, more snorted or sighed. “I support the
Arizona law! But here! Here are people wearing Che Guevara
T-shirts!
Carrying signs in Spanish!” He paused, “What does
this tell us? You don’t care! Illegal immigration’s okay with you,
by doing that, by supporting illegal immigration, you’re opposing legal
immigration!”
Lars, currently unemployed.
“Arizona’s law is lesser than the Federal law, which is not
enforced. All Arizona wants is for the Feds to do their jobs. Only
lawbreakers
need to worry. Federal law is the highest law. Not to support it is
treason.
Your oath of office requires you to enforce the law, not boycott it. The
city
council is trying to do economic damage to people who are trying to save
themselves.
Crystal
Taylor, an
elegant,
well turned-out African-American woman. “This is a legal issue! No one
in
this room should be opposed to it. Boycotting Arizona means you support
illegality!”
The
Boycotters & Reconquistas Rise
SB 1070 is
condemned by a troop of speakers, almost all are Latino. A female ACLU
lawyer
who works the immigrants’ rights desk, lawyers from various Hispanic
organizations, and a poetry reading college professor describes the law
as
xenophobic and inherently racist; that it’s racial profiling; it’s
mean-spirited and anti-human and an overt attack on Latinos to preserve
“white privilege.” They say a boycott of Arizona is the only way to
‘send a message’ and fight this example of racism and inhumanity,
and to support human rights. Mayor Johnson was continually assaulted
with
comparisons to the Civil Rights struggle, and Rev. King’s name was used
freely throughout the night.
Former
Police Chief Arturo Venegas.
“This is a racist law! It’s an outrageous attack on those least
able to protect themselves! It is the civil rights issue of our
day!”
His remarks were followed by cheers, shouts and applause.
President
(?), La Raza Lawyers Association.
“The express intent of this law is to achieve attrition through law. It
discriminates against everyone, Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, anyone
not
“Caucasian like me.” It’s a hate-based law and must be
abolished! We must stand up to it! We must say ‘NO!’ A boycott is
the only way.”
Melinda
Guzman, Attorney,
“This is Federal preemption. It’s not just racial profiling; it
bans ethnic studies, and even accented teachers. Soon kids will be
turning in
their parents to authorities. Let the Feds do their job! Tell Arizona to
back
off! Boycott Arizona!”
Central
Labor Council representative.
“This law is racism! It’s racist and it’s anti-worker, pure
and simple!”
The meeting
broke up late. There were a few shouts but nothing more than
“Racist!” and calling Dan the Marine a “KKK redneck.”
Mayor Johnson conducted himself well, and reprimanded speakers only four
or
five times.
At this
writing no other country has open borders, the Arizona immigration law
is
favored by 73% of Americans, and seventeen states are considering
adopting it,
or some form of it. In May the city of Boston adopted tough new
immigration
ordinances and is enforcing them. The most recent (6/2/10) Quinnipiac
poll
shows Americans want strong enforcement of existing federal law, not
‘comprehensive immigration reform,’ or reform followed by amnesty
or linked to citizenship.
Current
immigration policy and Southern Border Defense is the result of the past
four
administrations ignoring the problem deliberately. The Bushes wanted
cheap
labor, Clinton and Obama wanted voters.
Those who
would boycott Arizona offer no rational reason for doing so. Those who
would
repeal the law offer no solution to securing the border; in fact they
don’t want it secured. The reconquistas would flood the Southwest with
illegal immigrants and eventually take it over. Remember, a mass
migration is a
slow invasion. Arizona’s SB 1070 is ‘controversial’ only with
Mexicans crossing our southern border illegally, La Raza, ethno-centric
enablers, useful idiots and drug dealers.
As of this
writing the City of Sacramento has yet to vote on Councilman Fong’s
silly
resolution.
What is
described here can be viewed on your government public access channel,
only
it’s six hours longer.